they strike again
Jul. 7th, 2005 08:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
surei---------------------------------------------
Terrorist, n.
1. As a political term: Any one who attempts to further his views by a system of coercive intimidation.
OED
---------------------------------------------
Y'know, if these people were smart, they might have waited until interest in "the war on terrorism" petered out and the people pushing it got out of office and nobody was looking at them any more, and then tried to do something. Instead they have to blow people up in London. London!
The two terrorist organizations I know the most about - IRA and ELF - mainly focus on damaging property in order to make their point. In fact, the ELF takes great pride in not harming any living thing (by their definition, of course, which means people and animals). One blows up parts of buildings, the other writes messages in acid and tries to destroy research in genetic alterations.
Now, I'm not against killing. Where there are carnivores, and omnivores, and threats to life, there will be killing. But it's one thing to kill an animal (humans included) and then do something with the body, to put it to use. It's one thing to kill an animal in self defence, or in protection of young, or to prevent the spread of a disease, or to stop a crime. It's something entirely different to kill something in cold blood and leave it there to rot.
It just strikes me as stupid.
Terrorist, n.
1. As a political term: Any one who attempts to further his views by a system of coercive intimidation.
- (In early use also applied spec. to members of one of the extreme revolutionary societies in Russia. The term now usually refers to a member of a clandestine or expatriate organization aiming to coerce an established government by acts of violence against it or its subjects.)
OED
---------------------------------------------
Y'know, if these people were smart, they might have waited until interest in "the war on terrorism" petered out and the people pushing it got out of office and nobody was looking at them any more, and then tried to do something. Instead they have to blow people up in London. London!
The two terrorist organizations I know the most about - IRA and ELF - mainly focus on damaging property in order to make their point. In fact, the ELF takes great pride in not harming any living thing (by their definition, of course, which means people and animals). One blows up parts of buildings, the other writes messages in acid and tries to destroy research in genetic alterations.
Now, I'm not against killing. Where there are carnivores, and omnivores, and threats to life, there will be killing. But it's one thing to kill an animal (humans included) and then do something with the body, to put it to use. It's one thing to kill an animal in self defence, or in protection of young, or to prevent the spread of a disease, or to stop a crime. It's something entirely different to kill something in cold blood and leave it there to rot.
It just strikes me as stupid.